What you are downloading is an ISO file that will need to either be burned to disc or used to create a bootable flash drive with something like the free and portable Rufus.
That said, Q4OS Trinity is specifically designed to run on older machines with limited resources and in these cases, the machine might not support 64-bit so the only option would be to install Q4OS. Q4OS Trinity Live is available in 64-bit only whereas the install-only version is available in both 32-bit and 64-bit.
The Live version allows users to run the operating system from bootable media without installation so they can check it out beforehand, and this is the download I would recommend. Q4OS Trinity is available to download either in Live or install-only versions. At the end of that article, I promised to check out the Q4OS Trinity edition, a lightweight Debian-based Linux distro that resembles XP. This new breed of Linux is designed to run on embedded hardware, and consume minimal resources, making it a perfect choice for containers.We recently published an article discussing how Q4OS Plasma edition could easily be installed inside Windows. A mere five megabytes in size, Alpine Linux is on the opposite end of the spectrum from the full-fat Linux distributions of a few years ago, which were competing with Solaris and intended to run on massive hardware systems. Alpine LinuxĪlpine Linux, the underlying operating system for many official Docker images, is a great choice for the task. These give administrators a good way to experiment and potentially avoid vendor lock-in. Other distros, such as RancherOS and VMware Photon OS, provide greater flexibility, supporting multiple ecosystem components and orchestration systems. So much of the functionality has been put into the proprietary management layer that there is little hope of using the OS for anything else. On one extreme there are distributions designed to support only the higher levels of the stack, such as CoreOS Container Linux and Red Hat Project Atomic. Įach distribution takes a different approach to what to include in the stack. There are several solutions for this such as Etcd, Consul, and ZooKeeper. Take for example distributed configuration and service discovery. Just as the traditional Linux distros bundled different package managers, desktop environments, system utilities, services, and apps, most container distributions mix and match various components to create what they consider an optimum solution. You have one key element, in this case the Docker container, that is surrounded by a number of competing ecosystem components. The state of the industry with container deployment systems is very much like the early days of Linux distributions. Generically known as “container operating systems,” these stripped down, purpose built Linux distributions are not the only way to run containers in production, but they provide a base that does not waste resources on anything besides container support. Over the past six months I have reviewed five minimal Linux distributions that are optimized for running containers: Alpine Linux, CoreOS Container Linux, RancherOS, Red Hat Atomic Host, and VMware Photon OS.